MIP (Membrane Interface Probe)
What is Geoprobe® Direct Image® MIP?
- Logs VOC contaminants and soil EC with depth
- Shows distribution and relative magnitude of both halogenated and non-halogenated VOC contaminants.
- Great for determining contaminant mobility and migration pathways
- Only tool capable of logging VOCs in situ in real time
- Used worldwide for characterization of subsurface VOC contaminants
- Able to detect contaminants in both coarse and fine grained soils.
- Works in both saturated and unsaturated soils.
- Standard tool configurations combine the MIP with other sensors for lithology and permeability logging.
- Real time contaminant screening information is generated, allowing field adjustment of the site investigation.
The MIP was developed by Geoprobe Systems® and is presently manufactured and sold exclusively by Geoprobe Systems® and its distribution agents. The MIP has been used extensively in the U.S. and Europe for mapping the extent of VOC contamination in the subsurface. As a logging tool, the MIP offers many benefits to site investigators as listed above.
The MIP (membrane interface probe) is a direct push tool used to log the relative concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with depth in soil. An example log made using an MIP is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: An MIP log showing an EC soil log (left) with MIP-XSD contaminant log (right).
MIP Principle of Operation
The Membrane Interface Probe (MIP) is a screening tool with semiquantitative capabilities acting as an interface between volatile contaminates at depth in the soil and gas phase detectors at the surface (Figure 2). The MIP membrane is semipermeable and is comprised of a thin film polymer impregnated into a stainless steel screen for support. The membrane is approximately 6.35mm in diameter and can be easily replaced. The membrane is placed in a heated block attached to the probe. This block is heated to approximately 100-120 degrees C as the probe is advanced into the soil. Heating the block accelerates membrane diffusion while at the same time minimizing membrane absorption.
Figure 2: The MIP Principle of Operation. The downhole, permeable membrane serves as an interface to a detector at the surface. Volatiles in the subsurface diffuse across the membrane and partition into a stream of carrier gas where they can be swept to the detector. The membrane is heated so that travel by VOCs across this thin film is almost instantaneous. MIP acquisition software logs detector signal with depth.
Diffusion across the membrane is driven by the concentration gradient between the contaminated soil and the clean carrier gas behind the membrane. A constant gas flow of 35-45 mL/min sweeps behind the membrane and carries the contaminants to the gas phase detectors at the surface. Travel time from the membrane interface to the detector(s) is approximately 30-45sec (depending on the length of trunkline and flow rate).
Figure 3: GC1000 MIP Detector System.
Installed detectors: PID, FID, XSD
Sweep gas from the MIP membrane is directed to detectors that are part of the MIP instrument system at ground surface (Figure 3). The standard detectors installed by Geoprobe Systems® include the photoionization detector (PID), the flame ionization detector (FID), and the halogen specific detector (XSD). These detectors are employed in series with each detector providing sensitivity to a particular group or type of contaminant. The XSD is highly specific to halogenated compounds and is the best detector when the MIP is used for logging chlorinated solvent plumes or source areas (TCE, PCE, Carbon Tet, etc.). The PID provides sensitivity to aromatic compounds (BTEX) as well as confirmation of chlorinated ethylene compounds detected by the XSD. The FID is a general detector useful for hydrocarbon detection as well as confirmation of high concentration of all compounds seen on the other two detectors.
The MIP Log
In practice, multiple MIP logs are used on a site to find a source area of contaminant, to track the movement of a contaminant plume, to define the mass of contaminant for remediation, or to investigate the efficacy of a remediation treatment. Whatever the purpose of the MIP logging, there are always multiple logs used at any one site.
The MIP log shows the response of the MIP detectors with depth in the soil. The MIP data acquisition system makes this log by taking into account the travel time required for the membrane sweep gas to reach the MIP detectors at ground surface, thus converting the detector time data into MIP response with depth data. An example series of MIP logs from a contaminated site are shown in Figure 4. The logs in this series, or cross section, show the response of the PID detector in the MIP system with depth. The contaminant at this site is a fuel hydrocarbon from a former gas station. This figure shows the main utility of MIP logs in that the position of the contaminant, which varies from location to location, is described by the MIP log. The concentration of the contaminant also varies across the site, which is described by the wide range of responses shown on the MIP logs.
Figure 4: A series of MIP logs from a site contaminated with fuel hydrocarbons. The logs shown above are MIP-PID (photo ionization detector) logs in the shaded blue along with EC (dashed black line). These logs illustrate the use of MIP in defining the depth at which contaminants are encountered. The concentration represented in each of these logs is also vastly different with all logs being set to the scale 3x107. These logs were performed approximately 16m apart on the same site.
In practice, an MIP detector log is seldom used apart from a simultaneous log indicating lithology. This accompanying log can be of electrical conductivity (EC), hydraulic profile (HPT), or CPT parameters. The next two figures show the true power of combining lithology sensors with the MIP detectors in one profile. Figure 5 shows a MIP Log displaying EC, PID, XSD and FID detectors graphs at this location. Figure 6 shows an MiHPT Log displaying EC, HPT injection pressure (top axis) with absolute piezometric pressure (bottom axis), PID, XSD and FID detector graphs, along with estimated hydraulic conductivity.
Figure 5: A typical MIP log includes (from left to right) an EC log, MIP-PID, XSD, and FID detector graphs. The MIP-PID and FID indicates the majority of contaminant mass is at a depth of 25 to 32 feet. This log was obtained on a fuel hydrocarbon contaminated site which is confirmed by the lack of response on the XSD, which does not response to fuel hydrocarbons and other non-halogenated compounds. The EC log indicates there is a transition from a fine grain to coarse grain soil unit at this depth.
Figure 6: An MiHPT log includes (from left to right) an EC, HPT injection pressure (top axis) with Absolute Piezometric Pressure (bottom axis), MIP-PID, XSD, and FID detector graphs and estimated hydraulic conductivity (K). The MIP-PID and FID indicates the majority of contaminant mass is at a depth of 25 to 32 feet. This log was obtained on a TCE contaminated site which is confirmed by the similar responses on the PID and XSD. The EC log shows only marginal changes in this formation however the HPT pressure indicates the detector responses are occurring after the formation transitions into a zone of lower permeability (increased injection pressure).
Many other examples of MIP logs with various contaminant and lithologic settings can be found under the MIP: Literature/Presentation section of this website.
Geoprobe Systems® manufactures all of the equipment needed for MIP logging. This equipment can be divided into two basic categories: surface instrumentation (MIP controller, data acquisition, and detectors), and downhole probes (including probes, trunklines, connectors, etc.).
Figure 7: MIP Instrumentation.
A basic set of MIP instruments is shown in Figure 7. These instruments include the following as labeled in the Figure:
- FI6000: Data acquisition instrument, acquires data from the MIP system’s detectors and sensors and relays it to the computer via a USB connection. The FI6000 is the general data acquisition instrument used in all Geoprobe® DI logging systems (EC and HPT). It also provides the electrical conductivity measurement system associated with MIP.
- MP6500 Series MIP Controller: This instrument regulates and measures gas pressure and flow to the MIP probe and controls heating of the probe. Data from this controller is sent to the FI6000 via a data cable.
- GC1000: This is the platform of detectors used in the MIP System. Standard detectors offered in this system include the PID, FID, and XSD. Analog data outputs from this instrument are directed to the FI6000.
Figure 8: MiHPT Probe (MN 226720), Connection Tube (MN 219594), MIP Drive Head for 1.75” rods (MN 220130) for 1.5” rods (MN 220545), MIP Trunkline PEEK 150 ft. (MN 202570)
Basic downhole MIP equipment is shown in Figure 8. There are many variations and combinations of this tooling, depending on the size of the rod string being driven into the ground and the lithology or permeability sensors that are to be used in combination with the MIP. The standard, most commonly deployed components are shown in Figure 8. These components include:
- MH6534 MiHPT probe: 120 VAC heated probe with removable membrane, HPT screen and dipole electrical conductivity array.
- MIP Trunkline (MN 202570)/MiHPT Trunkline (MN 214114): 150 ft. (46m) with PEEK return line
- Connection section and drive head. Gas line and electrical connections are carried in this section.
- Probe rods. Geoprobe® 1.75-inch (44mm) and 1.5-inch (38mm) rods are the most commonly used for MIP logging. Successive sections of these rods are added to push or percussion drive the probe to depth.
Figure 9: MIP data is generated in real time displaying detector response graphs along with electrical conductivity readings of the soil all displayed on a field laptop at the surface and typically deployed under a direct push rig.
MIP Tool Configurations
There are several standard configurations of the MIP probe. Tool string diagrams showing part numbers for these various configurations are found on this website (click here: MIP – Tool String Diagrams). Standard probe configurations are shown in the following figures:
Figure 10: MH6534 MIHPT probe (MN 226720). This is a combined MIP and HPT probe. This probe offers the site investigator a powerful combination of logging tools; able to detect volatile compounds with the MIP, and estimate soil permeability with the HPT. The probe is also equipped with the standard EC dipole. This tool can be operated with all sensors collecting data or it can be used to collect just HPT-EC data or just MIP-EC data depending upon project and weather considerations.
Figure 11: MIP-CPT. The standard Geoprobe® MIP-EC sub (MN 213311) with Geotech AB - NOVA CPT probe. This configuration combines both EC and CPT measurements with the MIP. This tool combination features easy connection of the CPT cone. CPT deployment of MIP typically yields much longer life for the MIP probe compared to percussion driven models.
Purchasing an MIP System
The MIP system is available exclusively from Geoprobe Systems® and its authorized distributors. Please contact Geoprobe Systems® for a quotation for this equipment. Quotations for MIP equipment will include equipment and services in the following categories:
- MIP controller and data acquisition system.
- MIP detectors.
- Probes, trunklines, and push hardware.
Companies who already operate Geoprobe® EC or HPT systems may already have some of the instrumentation required to operate an MIP system (such as the FI6000 and various probe pushing hardware). Geoprobe Systems® is adamant that all MIP operators receive proper training. This training is designed to teach proper set-up and operation of the MIP system, practice of log Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) procedures, field trouble shooting, and log interpretation. Training is typically designed to include field exercises in MIP logging.
Geoprobe Systems® requires training for operators who are new to the MIP (MiHPT) system. New operators should always practice with an MIP (MiHPT) system in an actual in-ground logging exercise before using the MIP on a site investigation project.