785-825-1842 001-785-825-1842 785-825-1842 001-785-825-1842

Groundwater Monitoring Environmental Protection Article - References

Groundwater Monitoring Gets a Direct Push!
by Wesley McCall, Geoprobe Systems®

Back to the main article..

References

Applegate, Joseph L., and Douglas M. Fitton, 1997. Rapid Site Assessment Applied to the Florida Department of Environmental Protections's Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program. In Superfund XVIII Conference Proceedings Volume II. PP 695-703. E.J. Krause and Assoc.

ASTM 1999b. D 6282 Standard Guide for Direct Push Soil Sampling for Environmental Site Characterizations. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards Vol. 04.09 Soil and Rock (II). ASTM West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM 1999c. D6001 Standard Guide for Direct-Push Water Sampling for Geoenvironmental Investigations. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards Vol. 04.09 Soil and Rock (II). ASTM West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM D 6724. Standard Guide for Selection and Installation of Direct Push Ground Water Monitoring Wells. ASTM West Conshohocken, PA. In Press.

ASTM D 6725. Standard Practice for Direct Push Installation of Prepacked Screen Monitoring Wells in Unconsolidated Aquifers. ASTM West Conshohocken, PA. In Press.

Butler, James J. Jr., John M. Healey, G. Wesley McCall, Elizabeth J. Garnett and Steven P. Loheide II, 2002. Hydraulic Tests with Direct-Push Equipment. Ground Water Vol. 40, No. 1(??).

Butler, James J. Jr., 2002. Technical Note: A Simple Correction for Slug Tests in Small-Diameter Wells. Ground Water, Vol. 40, No. 3.

EPA 1991. Handbook of Suggested Practices for the Design and Installation of Ground-Water Monitoring Wells. Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. EPA/600/4-89/034. March

EPA 1996. Ground Water Issue: Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground-Water Sampling Procedures. EPA/540/S-95/504. April.

EPA 1997. Expedited Site Assessment Tools for Underground Storage Tank Sites: A Guide for Regulators. Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5403G. EPA 510-B-97-001. March.

EPA 1998. Seminars - Monitored Natural Attenuation for Ground Water. EPA/625/K-98/001. Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. September.

Kram, Mark; Dale Lorenza, Joel Michaelson and Ernest Lory, 2000. Performance Comparison: Direct-Push Wells Versus Drilled Wells. NFESC Technical Report TR-2120-ENV. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Washington, D.C. October.

McCall, Wesley, Susan Stover, Curt Enos and Greg Fuhrman, 1997. Field Comparison of Direct Push Prepacked Screen Wells to Paired HSA 2" Wells. In: Superfund XVIII Conference Proceedings Vol. 2. E.J. Krause & Assoc. December.

McCall, Wesley, 2000b. Innovative Direct Push Ground Water Monitoring Compared to Conventional Methods. In: Vol. 2, Risk Regulatory and Monitoring Considerations of the Second International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds. Battelle Press. Columbus, OH. pp 71 -78.

McCall, Wesley, James J. Butler, Jr., John Healey, Alyssa Lanier, Stephen Sellwood and Elizabeth Garnett, 2002. A Dual-Tube Direct-Push Method for Vertical Profiling of Hydraulic Conductivity in Unconsolidated Formations. Environmental & Engineering Geosciences, Vol. 8, No. 2. Assoc. of Engineering Geologists.

Thornton, Daniel, Stacey Ita and Kenyon Larsen, 1997. Broader Use of Innovative Ground Water Access Technologies. In Superfund XVIII Conference Proceedings Volume II. PP 639-646. E.J. Krause and Assoc.

Back to the main article..

© 2017 Kejr, Inc. | Privacy Policy